Sure buddy.
Sure buddy.
You should have said “sure buddy” and ignored them.
He is being charged with W R O N G T H I N K.
15 years ago I did a school paper on the pros of psychoactive drugs, including a presentation in front of my class.
Nowadays I’d have to make a public YouTube video to stop the hate I’d receive. Or at least get kicked out of class.
Nobody really cared about stuff that wasn’t affecting them.
I mean for the big software boys to actually start caring about it.
This feels like a scam just like those Elon Musk crypto scams you see everywhere.
It’s pretty sad how not having the money for it makes it unbearable, while all of them don’t need to experience it, disconnecting them from their practices.
They also take a cut from content purchases and tips to content creators.
llama3.1 (8B) by Facebook:
>>> what does the I in LLM stand for?
In the context of natural language processing (NLP) and artificial
intelligence, "LLM" typically stands for **L**arge **L**anguage **M**odel.
A Large Language Model is a type of machine learning model that has been
trained on large datasets to understand and generate human-like language.
These models are often used in applications such as text classification,
sentiment analysis, question answering, and even chatbots like myself!
I'm glad you asked!
>>> but the I !!!!
In the specific case of an LLM being a Large **L**anguage **M**odel, the
"LL" part doesn't explicitly mention the letter "I".
However, in the context of AI and ML models, there are other types of
models that do involve the letter "I", such as:
* ILM: Image Language Model (combining computer vision with natural
language processing)
* IMLM: Interpretable Machine Learning Model
* MLM: Masked Language Model (a specific type of LLM)
And then there's also...
* DALL-E, but that's a different story!
But in the case of the original LLM, it typically stands for Large
**L**anguage **M**odel.
Anybody that flies that many times a year should be sacrificed to the sun god. If the sun god doesn’t take us all before that.
The article implies nobody even knew it already had this functionality. I’m sure the customers weren’t told either.
They kept trying to ruin my experience so I’ve switched to Invidious and Odysee.
Invidious only for the content creators that don’t crosspost to Odysee yet.
Every video ad needs to have the video uploaded to YouTube afaik. So it’s possible to find it, although I’m not sure if it also works for private videos.
I am the admin of a website where we have a place where our users can post custom content and rate the content of others.
We have discussed how it works and should work many times and came to the conclusion that we’d never want it to be public. Any report of abuse will be checked by the website owner directly in the database and even admins don’t have full access. Everybody tries to stay as far away from the personal ratings as possible.
We also noticed that it would be a lot more fragile when there are not many voters. A whole group that is negative about something wouldn’t get as much harassment as a single person having a unique opinion.
On our website we have a comment section that isn’t anonymous, and we even noticed that people often don’t post something negative when it would be obvious that they are the only one who has voted/rated something. (“Negative” is almost always constructive in our case)
These are just a few things that I think add to this discussion.
Making a browser addon/extension wouldn’t be too hard if you can get the data somewhere. And then it’s just a click of a button to get the functionality.
Hence why I gave a solution. It would simply become spam that should be handled by the instance where it originates from.
What if an instance sends 1000 fake hashes as votes?
What’s the difference from users though?
You’d give each user an anonymous vote ID that only the instance can link back to their username.
It should actually be made more private.
I really dislike that guy. I was interested in his website but lost interest because of him. I already forgot why I started disliking him. But this just adds to that.