![](https://lemmy.ca/pictrs/image/5f25d5b2-3567-4d38-991c-b8a887261fce.webp)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/170721ad-9010-470f-a4a4-ead95f51f13b.png)
Oh, we do have a !talesfromtechsupport
community (link). Looks like the mod is inactive and the community doesn’t have that many subscribers
Maybe we can try making a new one here on programming.dev
I waddled onto the beach and stole found a computer to use.
🍁⚕️ 💽
Note: I’m moderating a handful of communities in more of a caretaker role. If you want to take one on, send me a message and I’ll share more info :)
Oh, we do have a !talesfromtechsupport
community (link). Looks like the mod is inactive and the community doesn’t have that many subscribers
Maybe we can try making a new one here on programming.dev
That’s part of why I clicked the article, I was confused if I read it correctly
The article is nice, but I’m not sure if I’d send it to friends that aren’t familiar with the fediverse. It seems to gloss over some problems and focus less relevant ones
It doesn’t touch on the issues with Blueskys protocol and makes it sound like an equivalent choice (or worse, a better choice). In the downsides section it touches on racism in badly moderated instances, and the difficulty of setting up an instance. Those issues aren’t relevant to the vast majority of users who will join a large instance that has defederated from the bad stuff.
It’s a nice article for those who are already somewhat familiar, but a bad first impression
Very cool, thank you!
This is both really cool, and really unsettling. I wonder if this research might help in the other direction as well, such as with transplants and grafts
sarcasm is already hard to understand online, even harder for generative AI
I know sometimes I would take a peek at the person’s comment history to see if they were well informed / a shill for the product. The AI can’t do that
Oops, should be fixed now
Thanks!
I like !privacyguides@lemmy.one because the project is behind it
Whenever friends ask about resources, I always link them to the privacyguides website. I should use their community more as well
See if you can find a friend who owns a particular model and is comfortable letting you try it on. How it fits is the most important thing IMO.
Samsung ones seem reliable, but one big downside is that the app (Galaxy Wearable), has a number of required permissions. The app does not function without them, even if you don’t need those features. I’m not sure what the workarounds are, and maybe you can make do without the app, but here is the list:
- Calendar
- Call logs
- Contacts
- Nearby Devices
- Phone
- SMS
You can read more about the privacy aspect of the popular brands here:
https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/privacynotincluded/categories/headphones/
I was about to recommend Heliboard since that’s the best one so far IMO, but it also doesn’t have emoji search. Turns out I was using the “recent emojis” menu
That might help in the meantime till a better recommendation comes around
There actually is a bot here for that
@RemindMe@programming.dev 12 hours
This makes me think of people who have trouble in airports because their name is similar to someone else’s.
Only this is going to be much harder to deal with
Wouldn’t they be? They could measure how likely it is that someone clicks on the generated link/text
It could also be A/B testing, so not everyone will have the AI running in general
Most of the details are things that you might already know, or assumed was happening, but the article is a helpful resource for links, evidence, citations, and summaries
Which do you recommend?
Do you have any guides or tips for others that might want to do the same?
‘clean up your PC’ type programs get sketchy, so reliable recommendations would be appreciated
I must have had a very surface level understanding of what it was. The parts I saw previously were about finding which charities to donate to and career development.
I’ve got more to read about for sure
rise to cultish ideas such as effective altruism
I hadn’t heard of any controversies around EA, it always seemed like a positive thing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effective_altruism
So what I’m getting is that the philosophies aren’t the problem, but rather it’s members of the community doing unethical things in the name of the movement
Sam Bankman-Fried
Bay Area Misogyny
In a 2023 Time magazine article, seven women reported misconduct and controversy in the effective altruism movement. They accused men within the movement, typically in the Bay Area, of using their power to groom younger women for polyamorous sexual relationships.[147] The accusers argued that the majority male demographic and the polyamorous subculture combined to create an environment where sexual misconduct was tolerated, excused or rationalized away.
Still bad and needs calling out
Oh I don’t mind it, I like the post :)
I was thinking that there might be a lot of Lemmy users working in such roles, without a place (that I know of) to share those stories