![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
looks like the engineers misunderstood what “training mode” was supposed to do.
they would want to improve their track record after this, otherwise the public would just choo them up.
looks like the engineers misunderstood what “training mode” was supposed to do.
they would want to improve their track record after this, otherwise the public would just choo them up.
cheers mate.
what are these rules? i genuinely am not aware of them.
see star trek TNG episode The Arsenal of Freedom for a more explicit visualisation of this ☝️ guy’s point.
“open the fridge door, HAL”
“i’m sorry, Dave. i’m afraid i can’t do that.”
he kept trying to climb up not realising that he was getting deeper and deeper.
quite ironically in this context, san jose is named after st. joseph – he of the legal dad of jesus fame – who was once famously told there was no room at the inn and had to make do in a stable.
just an inquiry out of curiosity: why are more people not using Gimp? does PS really offer so much more?
(this is more an aside to the conversation in the OP, and as such is not meant to derail the query asked within. nor is it an attempt to pass judgement on anyone.)
Reuters had a choice to reword the article (like some other media houses in OP’s link have done) or retract the article. they have chosen to do the latter.
the core difference is that choice. had the court deemed that the article should have been taken down, Reuters wouldn’t have even had that choice.
getting mad at the court in this case is akin to getting mad at the car that a drunk driver drove into a house. sure, it has been the proximal instrument of destruction, but it wasn’t the one who veered off the road.
blame the leeching lawyers here.
just a minor clarification. the court did not order the article to he taken down. the court just said that the article constitutes defamation.
it was Reuter’s decision to therefore take down the article. in OP’s first link, there’s info of other media houses that have also pulled such stories.
blame the scummy lawyers protecting the scumbag and his predatory behaviour.
you do know that you could have made your point in a nicer manner, yes? why would we want to bring the strenuous tones of hollow outrage from reddit to here?
we are all better than that, even the big danish guys.
what have they replaced the X button on their controllers with, then?