![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
We really are
We really are
Of course not
Alternatively: MSs AI plans and the negative reaction to them has reduced their value cf Apple
People can mean different things. Intelligence can mean a calculator doing a sum, and it can mean the way humans talk to each other. AI can do some intelligent things without people agreeing that it’s intelligent in the latter sense.
No that’s not it at all. People know that they don’t know some things. LLMs do not.
LLMs aren’t even hallucinating thou. It’s a euphamistic term to make it’s limitations sound human like
I’m 100% sure he can’t. Or at least, not from LLMs specifically. I’m not an expert so feel free to ignore my opinion but from what I’ve read, “hallucinations” are a feature of the way LLMs work.
Yeah actually i hadn’t thought about that aspect of it, but I did enjoy waterfall projects much more.
I so agree with you. Especially that software engineering is not like actual engineering. Ironically that’s the first point of the agile manifesto - is all about the people and interactions, not the tools and processes. That’s why I’m leery about these grand claims about agile failures when half the time they mean scrum and just doing scrum isn’t agile (see point one of the manifesto)
Imo waterfall is an imagined beast for most software devs today. I worked on many successful waterfall projects. It was nowhere as bad as the caricature that people imagine.
I’m always sceptical about results like these. I was told that waterfall always failed when I’d worked on successful waterfall projects with no fails. The complaints about waterfall were exaggerated as I think are complaints about agile. The loudest complaints seem to always be motivated by people trying to sell sonething
Announcements like this just remind me that new phones have become phenomenally uninteresting.
Agreed! And that’s where the problem lies. It’s not tech so much as our existing power structures.
Disagree that all work is valid. That only makes sense in a world with no resource constraints
Tech is neither good nor bad, but control of tech is a major issue.
I’m aware it’s been done before and your sarcasm isn’t appreciated
The tragedy here is that as an experiment, this could be informative.
I doubt it
I also learned C on the Amiga. I loved SAS C. I also came across C++ first on the Amiga when it was just a pre processor for C. I really loved that machine but it was the community that was special
Bs