![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Doing scientific experiments to understand the risks is worth doing.
Doing scientific experiments to understand the risks is worth doing.
Authentication of the author is not the same as copyright.
I don’t, it’s not the 18th century and the industrial revolution. Copyright had a time and place and that isn’t the here and now. We are worse off for copyright and patients today. Today they enshrine wealth and are a tool to prevent progress and inflate cost.
Using it to generate things that you double check. Transforming generative work to review work is a boost in productivity. So writing of any kind, art, etc. asking the llm for facts without context is a gross mistake. Prompting it to generate a specific paragraph in a larger, technical or regulator document is useful.
It’s a path but, also its always been like that. Also there is a supermarket with the same idea, HEB center market.
That’s why I use webcrwaler
The world is a much worse place with bad search. We need a search system that is treated like a utility and paid based on success not ad views.
It’s not as if Google’s results have improved in that time span. They are significantly worse now.
You can give people infections on purpose. If he had died of a genetic heart defect it would be different.
Can’t kill them the same way, then it would be obvious.
Galactic center is the frame to use for any space travel.
UTC doesn’t become wrong, you can either just accept a different pace of the clock, i.e. earth ppl will be ever so late to a meeting or it’s just a different kind of timezone conversion. Better would be to have a single time based on the reference frame of the center of the galaxy and everyone keep there time relative to that.
Yes
The comment above ignored the article and is just talking how digital media can be revoked.
That wasn’t the point being made.
No. If you make money from ads your clients are the adversers and your readers are an asset you seek to capitalize. That is in opposition to journalistic integrity.
I got enough installed once to fill the whole screen.
The current laws most certainly do not work. The fact that they don’t work is a willing failure on the part of the lawmakers.
It all depends on the details, but power is a local produced good and is not something that can be escaped with laws that want to stop carbon emissions.
It’s highlighting a potential significant risk. Major ozone loss is much worse than lack of internet. The high uncertainty of the paper is easily offset by the harm that would be caused if the paper is correct.