![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Careful bud, you’re really working over my feelings here.
Keep fluffing each other
Why do you want to be God’s specialist little guy? You didn’t contribute anything other than “oh I used Windows XP, unlike other Gen z.” it’s so insignificant and boring. Nothing personal but I’m just calling a spade a spade.
Removed by mod
So is that like, what gets the kids street cred? Windows XP usage?
Pretty cool I guess?
No, really, if you understood how the language models work, you would understand it’s not really intelligence. We just tend to humanize it because that’s what our brains do.
There’s a lot of great articles that summarize how we got to this stage and it’s pretty interesting. I’ll try to update this post with a link later.
I think LLMs are useful (and fun) and have a place, but intelligence they are not.
Some new competiton would be nice too. I remember when companies like Palm made their own competent OS. I wouldn’t even mind if Windows mobile made a reappareance. What do people even need anymore except a versatile browser and the ability to play games?
I heard about this thing but couldn’t really tell what the idea was. I think I want to carry less, not more on me.
Haha right? Remember the Equifax breach? I think the security claim isn’t genuine in intent, but I can believe that all else being equal, privacy violation does result in risk to security.
Even more reason to solve the underlying issues and hold companies accountable for how they handle privacy and personal information. Ideally I’d like to see the hoarding of personal data be somehow demonitized.
No candy crush for this guy!
This is the wrong way to go about solving this problem IMO, but then again the problem they’re trying to solve is more about security than privacy as a right.
Wow this is gross. I’m gonna wash it down with some MOUNTAIN DEW ™
Musk is a moron and I hope he keeps getting exposed
Very informative, I think people will learn from what you’re saying, but it doesn’t really matter to what I’m saying.
Yes, absolutely, consider the human element in your data encryption and protection schemes and implementations.
Beating someone with a pipe is a joke, but not really defeating an algorithm.
I appreciate the explaination, that’s a cool scheme, but what I saying is the human leaking the key is not the fault of the algorithm.
Everyone and everything is, on a very pedantic level, weak to getting their ass beat lol
That doesn’t make it crypt analysis
Doesn’t break the algorithm though, you would just have the key and then can use the algorithm (that still works!) to decrypt data.
Also you’re talking about one class of cryptography, the concept of key knowledge varies between algorithms.
My point is an attacker having knowledge of the key is a compromise, not a successful break of the algorithm…
“the attacker beat my ass until I gave them the key”, doesn’t mean people should stop using AES or even RSA, for example.
No, really though, where’s it from?
Where is this from? I don’t think exposing the key breaks most crypto algorithms, it should still be doing its job.
7-11 is owned by a Japanese company, and has stores worldwide. You’re free to make whatever you want, though!