touché
Let me fall
into the darkness
empty
and become void.
touché
strongly bound you say?
In Java, it’s not called the Crackable
interface.
It’s the Nuttable
interface.
function is_equal (x, y) {
if (x == y)
print("x is equal to y")
return true;
return false;
}
What do you do about a dataset which contains 11999 fine numbers, but one of them is NaN because George called in sick that week? Throw away the whole dataset because it doesn’t fit the data type?
idk if you ever had to actually work with floats,
but in statistics, you deal with NaNs all the time. Data is absent from the data set. If it would be an error every time, you wouldn’t get anything done.
IMO, floats model real observations.
And since there is no precision in nature, there shouldn’t be precision in floats either.
So their odd behavior is actually entirely justified. This is why I can accept them.
math are numbers and therefore non-physical, and therefore esoterical, so stop giving it credit.
/s
you can configure it in the web interface. just go to your profile
I have the suspicion that many LGBTQ-people are more inclined to colorfulness than non-LGBTQ-people.
Since computers, unlike humans, lack intuition, I doubt that computers could organise themselves. So there probably always has to be a sysadmin, even if the sysadmin is a computer themself.
Have you considered that other people might not want that, though?
Basically Java in a nutshell
Cannot confirm.
I use google maps regularly, and it mostly works fine.
However, google search engine (and youtube recommendations) have gone on a steeply downhill rollercoaster ride. Nowadays, I have difficulty researching even the most basic topics on Google, because it is so clustered with ads that I cannot tell anymore whether any website is genuine or trying to scam me.
We need a google that uses AI/ML to hunt and de-rank the 1800 word essay web pages that answer the question, “how long should you microwave a baked potato for?”
“In 1863, county cork in Ireland, Shamus O’Toole created the world first commercial potato farm. He’d go on to…”
Exactly what it feels like if I’m asked to “write an 700-word article” somehow. Most of it is just filler material, really.
Edgy comment here but:
In another thread we were discussing AI-generated CSAM. Thread:
https://feddit.de/post/6315841
You would probably agree, then, that such material is not problematic, because even if it looks like CSAM, and it quacks like CSAM, it is not CSAM, therefore we don’t have to take it seriously or regulate it in similar ways that we do regulate actual CSAM, if I continue your logic, no?
I believe that at a certain point, “agency” is an emergent feature. That means that, while all the single bits are well understood probability-wise, the total picture is still more than that.
It makes sense to me to accept that if it looks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck, then it is a duck, for a lot (but not all) of important purposes.
I disagree. This is no meaningful talking point. It doesn’t help anyone in practice. Sure, it clears legal questions of responsibility (and I’m not even sure about that one in the future), but apart from that, making an artificial distinction between a human and a looks-and-acts-like-human, provides no real-world value.
Probably even if the data is incomplete or fragmented, humans can still draw value from it.
On Android Firefox, you can just use the share button from the browser context menu for that site.