Agreed, it’s such a poor summary of the article that I can’t tell if it’s an intentional strawman argument.
Agreed, it’s such a poor summary of the article that I can’t tell if it’s an intentional strawman argument.
Be so bold.
Sorry, that was the best link I could find at that moment. Since the word “ubuntu” means something like “humanity towards others,” Canonical really leaned into that concept with their tagline “Linux for human beings” in the early days. This involved shipping some controversial wallpaper images and using less risque shots from the same photo shoot on things like the CD-ROM cover.
Ubuntu used to be naked people!
Microsoft’s Windows 10 and Windows 11 operating systems are PCMag Editors’ Choice picks
lol
Editorializing is TechDirt’s whole thing. If you’re looking for objectivity over analysis you can tap the blue words on their post and read the original reporting.
Yep.
I agree with this, but in open source there’s an extra layer of complexity: the “I don’t care about market share” dev attitude that’s sometimes admirable and sometimes frustrating.