On iOS I’ve been using Vinegar - Tube Cleaner
by developer And a Dinosaur. It doesn’t replace YouTube as a whole - only the video player. Better interface, no ads.
On iOS I’ve been using Vinegar - Tube Cleaner
by developer And a Dinosaur. It doesn’t replace YouTube as a whole - only the video player. Better interface, no ads.
FUD wars on Free and Open Source Software, shady deals with companies and governments to make them dependent on MS software and solutions, holding the web hostage to IE “standards”, …
Could you provide a source for this claim? Not doubting you but I haven’t seen it.
Founding member of company that stands to make fortunes through a product endorses said product.
Instead of being a dick about it, why don’t you show what they’re doing and why you don’t like it, so we can all be educated and/or have a conversation about it, so everyone can decide for themselves if it’s a problem for them?
They’re also prioritising a few great and much needed QoL improvements like vertical tabs, tab grouping and a new Profile Management system!
https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/heres-what-were-working-on-in-firefox/
This is not defeat. It’s a strategic retreat on their part.
It’s embrace, extend, extinguish. Get workers used to going to the office one or two times a week whilst making it seem like they conceded, then slowly return to the legacy status quo.
Edit: lol why the downvotes? Do people really believe “the CEOs” have been “defeated”?
3rd party cookies make tracking users easier when the same cookie can be used on many websites.
Firefox does 2 things to protect you from that: it blocks known trackers cookies by default; and for the others it isolates them per domain so that kind of tracking doesn’t happen. That ensures you’re not tracked and at the same time it doesn’t break any functionality.
If you want to completely block them you can. There’s more info here: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/third-party-cookies-firefox-tracking-protection
Actually pretty much all browsers support tables, it’s been part of the HTML spec forever.
Hey, no need to be sorry. I appreciate the search for correctness and especially the reference document.
Here’s what I’ve found.
There is no mention of km/h
in section 4, “Non-SI units that are accepted for use with the SI”. It does mention h
, making it a “non-SI unit that’s accepted for use with the SI.”
km/h
is its own unit separate from h
. It’s a unit of speed, derived from km
and h
.
My gut feel at this point is that km/h
could be an SI unit since it’s a unit of speed derived from an SI unit for distance and a non-SI unit accepted for use with the SI for time.
Furthermore, searching the document for mentions of km/h
, there’s this bit on page 127, section 2.1, “Defining the unit of a quantity”:
For a particular quantity different units may be used. For example, the value of the speed v of a particle may be expressed as v = 25 m/s or v = 90 km/h, where metre per second and kilometre per hour are alternative units for the same value of the quantity speed.
This paragraph suggests (even though it doesn’t outright say it) that km/h
is indeed an SI unit.
I haven’t found anything clearly saying whether km/h
is an SI unit or not. Not on that document, not by searching the web. The research above makes me lean towards the idea that it is one.
If you found otherwise, I’d love to compare notes and learn further.
km/h is an SI unit.
The international standard is km/h.
Perhaps, and I’ll readily admit my ignorance on this.
That said, I doubt the HDR overhead would be any larger than the equivalent baseline SDR content.
If my intuition is right, depending on other factors like compression you could still fit at least 2 streams on that bandwidth.
100mbps should be enough for a few 4K streams, and I imagine you’re not streaming more than one thing to your TV at any given time.
They could be, but 2M new Brazilian users after Twitter’s block there actually seems quite low and definitely credible.