blazera

Right, it’s a new technology, its usage is being curated. Even once they release a publicly accessible application, it’ll be like going to the hammer renting store, you get to go there and use a hammer, for a fee sometimes, you cant bring the hammer home or own it, they regulate what you can work on with it, it can be overused and inaccessible while demand is high, they can discontinue access when they want.

And they can and do give more access to wealthier clients.

Everyone has access to the same tools

go make me something with Sora to see what kind of equal access you think you have

amazon is a marketplace, not a manufacturer

Its a common misconception, prices are never based on cost, its what people are willing to pay. Now, what people are willing to pay can be influenced by perceived costs, but thats pretty artificial too. The prices at a restaurant for example vary pretty wildly in profit margins. Pretty famously, sodas cost cents to make, but people are willing to pay orders of magnitude more.

Id love to hear him scientifically define a loser. Specific metrics with units and shit.

They both always are. Companies make up the prices, and price increases. Predicting how much folks are willing to pay.

All these folks talking in work chats in encryption algorithms and riddles, if only a technology could make these words legible.

AI interacts with data thats already there, its not a data collector.

Make a law to power everything with green energy

claim the internet titan artificially inflates prices

All prices are artificial.

they dont even make a case of what benefit this provides besides money for specifically them. Go into a different industry if consumers dont want what you’re selling.

Ive never understood the dependence on Amazon. It’s not even a monopoly, I’ve never bought anything online that somewhere else didnt also offer the product, usually an online store specializing in that product.

How do subsidies=crash, and what are more effective emissions reductions solutions than renewable energy and electrifying transit?

Even if its not some altruistic reasons, they still are literally subsidizing this emissions reducing technology.

Tho they are also going pretty ham on subsidizing renewable energy too.

I want a top speed of 50, 100 mile range, single seater, and a price tag to match

Those bastards, subsidizing emissions reducing technologies.

It says it a few times about x86 being decades old…but so is ARM? I dont know whats supposed to be game changing about it.

more specifically for the goal of this law, to reduce impaired driving, there’s the insane zoning requirements of minimum parking for bars of all places. Other countries have less drunk driving than us because they enable transit that doesnt require you to drive, rather than just trying to forbid drunk driving with no other alternatives.

America will do anything to not implement public transit and less car dependency.

Even with public support this isnt something I’d expect to see in my lifetime, this would be a huge undertaking, a milestone for a more advanced civilization in the future. I’d compare it to space travel, something that was figured as theoretically possible long before it was even attempted. It was a massive effort, but it was possible and was achieved and now many many decades later its having practical applications for things like satellites. But Musk has put it into a bit of a dark age, where its disregarded as a meme and so wont be seeing any advancement for quite some time.