I don’t really follow your logic, how else would you propose to shape the audio that is not “just an effect”.

Your analogy to real life does not take into account that the audio source itself is moving, so their is an extra variable outside of just stereo signal -which is what spatial audio is modelling

And your muffling example sounds a bit over simplified maybe? My understanding is that the spatial stuff is produced by phase shifting the LR signals slightly

Finally why not go further? “I don’t listen to speaker audio because it’s all just effects and mirages to sound like a real sound, what only 2^16 discrete positions the diaphragm can be in” :p

This is an extremely odd outlook to have. Good luck with it.

Unfortunately the answer to your question is to not post at all, though if your contributions are worthwhile then that is not an excellent solution

There’s is a huge difference though.

That being one is making hardware and the other is copying books into your training pipeline though

The copy occurs in the dataset preparation.

Privacy preserving federated learning is a thing - essentially you train a local model and send the weight updates back to Google rather than the data itself…but also it’s early days so who knows what vulnerabilities may exist