![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
I remember them saying all the same exact things in the early 2000s after a slew of widespread disasters. Security will never be a higher priority than whatever cool new thing they want to sell.
I remember them saying all the same exact things in the early 2000s after a slew of widespread disasters. Security will never be a higher priority than whatever cool new thing they want to sell.
I got banned for spreading “disinformation” about how badly the war with Ukraine is going for Russia.
Where did I advocate for open porn in the workplace? My only point was that it’s a sign of societal issues that there would be a gender based difference in how people see the issue. That’s not anti-woman, it’s just pointing out broader issues.
Aren’t society’s norms arbitrary? There are certainly societies where showing tits is normal.
The fact that someone’s gender makes a difference is part of that “social wound” they mentioned.
I have a hunch that “working” would not exactly be a top priority.
Brain fart. My bad.
deleted by creator
The big oil corporations have been busy buying up all the competing charging networks, so that much tracks.
Despite being born into money, he managed to take on so much risk that it society had to bail him out. Even so, I’m certain that his net worth after bankruptcy was significantly higher than the vast majority in gen-z.
Except they were two different claims. “Some guy named Jesus existed”, and “Some guy named Jesus was a street preacher”.
“Jesus” is a Latin translation of a Greek translation of the Hebrew name Yeshua so, yes, “Jesus” wasn’t literally a common name in Israel. It was actually Yeshua (יְהוֹשֻׁעַ,) that was a common name.
Some version of Jesus absolutely existed, since is was a pretty common name. Street preachers were not uncommon either, so it’s very possible that there was one named Jesus.
The real debate about whether Jesus existed is whether any of the biblical stories are at all accurate. There is No reason to think they are.
Communication is kinda important.
Yes, but what would be the advantage of handling that traffic twice when your already paying someone else to do it?
Just imagine the US goes to war and Elon shuts them off because some foreign leader strokes his (let’s say) ego.
This is certainly possible from a technical perspective, but it’s unlikely that it would happen in reality. Consumer product companies are invariably going to want to outsource ads to a third party, not host them from their own systems. It’s also going to be a pretty small percentage of customers that would bother to do this, and they are probably not the ones that are likely to make purchases based on ads anyways.
It would seem to be rational that the less mass of metal in a connection, the faster that connection will charge or discharge voltage. Physical sockets require a lot more mass just to ensure solid contact.
Not that I support either but, if corporations get free speech, why wouldn’t AI?
There would have to be some kind of currently unforseen breakthroughs before something like that would be even remotely possible. In all likelihood, quantum computing would stay in specialized data centers. For the problems quantum would solve, there is really no advantage to having it local anyways.