TigrisMorte

Their theory is that they can replace Human employees with this and thus save money.

Library, look it up. And the publishers always hated Libraries.

Only one remaining! Order soon!

“That’s a joke, I say that’s a joke son” - Foghorn Leghorn

(in case it really did whiz on by; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Tracy_(character) https://i.pcmag.com/imagery/encyclopedia-terms/dick-tracy-watch-_dtwatch.fit_lim.size_640x.jpg

Your calling files, book documents to be specific, books, doesn’t change that IA is storing files, ebooks to be specific, nor that the ruling shall affect all Libraries, which includes the Internet Archive to be specific. And the actual issue, is that the publishers refuse to offer ebooks to Libraries as they assume it’ll cost sales when in fact the folks using the Library are there as they are not going to go buy one.

You are simply wrong from the get go. This is the only way it’ll ever get addressed, is 100% in the stated purpose of the Internet Archive, the dumb part isn’t on the side of preservation efforts, there isn’t a separate issue nor is there a separate copyright the publishers are the same with the exact same unsustainable arguments regardless of web page, code, or ebook.
You are making the same mistake made upon a lot of patents, assuming “but on a computer” is somehow transformative.

Guess he’ll never know then. What are they supposed to be a detective or something?

And just like that you’ve seen one. Now contact the prior dude on his trist welevision and let them know.

sort by new

Not after they eat one of googlie’s AI recipes they don’t, not anymore.

They all hope it’ll end years of having to pay employees.

As well as no clue how not to make every product they have shit over time.

It is Xitter where Xcrete posts. And always shall it remain.

“Americans are keeping their vehicles longer than ever. According to new data from S&P Global Mobility, the average age of cars and light trucks on U.S. roads is a record 12.5 years this year. That’s up three months over the 2022 analysis.May 18, 2023”

A: I never suggested anything remotely counter to adblock aps. I simply stated that you must understand you are trusting the dev.

B: Never stated any issue with any of those nor anything else.

C: Quit assuming intent, read what was actually written, and you may learn to understand what is being said.

I am informing that others may make educated decisions and not assume security where none is present. Kindly limit yourself and not others.

the thread is about as blockers. The post I commented to was about learning scripts or trusting a compiled App. My comment was “easy is a trap”. So, no, none of you premise is remotely relevant. My opinion, that you are trusting and not safe when using a compiled app. was the only point I made, the only point I tried to make, and at no point did I make any effort whatsoever to change people’s habits. So, kindly keep your assumptions and insistence upon people playing your idiotic game to yourself.

Again, you assume things and argue against what I never said. My comment was about easy is a trap. Nothing more. Nothing less. Kindly take your posturing and sit upon it.

My likes and dislikes were never discussed in any way. Your entire premise is disingenuous. Assumption does not make something so.

I stated no such thing and a compiled app can only be assumed FOSS, unless you inspected the code prior to compile, there is no way to know for certain what is in it, only what it does.