Successful reversal meaning they managed to glue the tubes back together. Successful pregnancies are significantly lower afaik
Successful reversal meaning they managed to glue the tubes back together. Successful pregnancies are significantly lower afaik
Plastic is stored in the balls
Same. I read the name and thought, wow they’re posting something unrelated for once if it’s on Technology.
Nope lmaooo
mental illness
What a sad view
I don’t think I was being wrong, technically, I do think you can write that way if you want to be a bit facetious, but I’m not a native speaker so, maybe not.
Some AI, namely, LLMs, can hallucinate, but not AI in general. I just had a bit of fun in how I worded it, I guess I should’ve expected someone to become annoyingly nitpicky about it.
No, the model isn’t “thinking”, no model in use today has anything resembling an internal cognitive process. It is making a prediction. A covid test is predicting whether you have the Covid-19 virus inside you or not. If its prediction contradicts your biological state, it is wrong. If an object recognition algorithm does not predict there being a firetruck, how is that not being wrong in the same way?
When I use “AI” I’m using computer science terminology. Artificial intelligence is a subfield of CS, in that sense, any model that comes of that field is, by definition, AI.
Yeah, well it’s not the same. Models are wrong all the time, why use a different term at all when it’s just “being wrong”?
Besides generative AI, which models can hallucinate?
AI is not prone to hallucinations, LLMs are. I doubt Amazon is building a chatbot to optimise packaging.
This seems like further confirmation of that theory that I saw posted on here that the Saudi oil barons funded Elon’s purchase of Twitter for the sole purpose of destroying it.
Then why does it still exist? Musk took Twitter private, they could’ve just pulled the plug if they wanted to.
The music industry adapted for the most part.
Did it, though?
https://cdn.statcdn.com/Infographic/images/normal/17244.jpeg
Profits are up? The articles literally tells you in the first sentence that Bumble is losing money.
It needs to become profitable because it was unprofitable for 20 years. Would you dump millions into something that doesn’t even have the chance to make you money in the first place? Reddit wouldn’t even exist anymore.
deleted by creator
No. There are lots of ways to short a stock which just means betting that a stock will fall. If you buy Puts you go short, you can only lose the money you spent on the Puts. What you are talking about is unhedged short selling but that is far from the only method to short a stock.
Always amusing to watch him throw a temper tantrum