Two wars can exist simultaneously.

I know it’s dead. I still have it, and it still does all I want from an IDE.

Well, LLMs are, at least. But also, autocomplete is already AI, so really LLMs are just glorified AI. And that checks out, they are the ones that get all the glory*. Everything else is just spooky algorithms.

*Except for walking robots and stuff like that.

I was surprised when I made attackPower and it suggested defensePower next. It was then that it sunk in that the autocomplete was AI.

Same here, but Atom. Maybe I should start using Atom again.

I googled it, there is an option to sync it to your Microsoft account, but I can’t say whether that’s on by default when you turn on clipboard history because I skipped adding a Microsoft account. But if it is, you can turn it off in Settings -> System -> Clipboard.

StackOverflow will discourage you when you’re right. ChatGPT will encourage you when you’re wrong.

After success with my senior project, developing a real game with a team of 15 that we’re releasing on Steam, which I feel really good about, I crave the experience of working in a team to develop a game. But of course, my hobby project is a nonprofit endeavor so I can only expect volunteers, and even though I feel I can get the coding down mostly on my own, I feel like I might be asking too much by hoping for an artist or few to join with me… maybe I just need to change up my approach, and offer equal shares of creative control, that way it’s not “help me make my game” so much as “join me and we’ll make our game.”

Hey buddy, your value is not what capitalists are willing to pay for your time.

Let’s bump those numbers up.

Because they’re discussing crimes, or…?

I only skimmed it, but I did read through the satire article. So I just read through the one linked here, and I don’t see where you’re getting that from. The tiktok doesn’t say it’s satire in the video either. I don’t use tiktok, but from what I can see, the account description doesn’t appear when you’re just watching the video.

I’ve never heard of this, but my guess is some people shared the headline and people reacted to that without clicking on the link, and even if they did click on the link, they didn’t tab into the about page or read the “please subscribe” bit at the end, which are the only places it says it’s satire if you’re going in from a link. Other than that, it just reads like a sarcastic conservative-leaning writer talking about real plans.

Of course that’d never happen over here, right? You’d never react to a headline without reading the article, right guys? And even if you did, you’d at least tab into the about page to check if it’s satire, right? Right? . . . guys?

It all reads hollow

because there is no “I”.

It’s a puppet,

and ChatGPT’s lawyers are making the mouth move

in that instance.