• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle


  • I did this in my town. It was a local theater though, not a big chain

    • Went on a Wednesday night and rented access to a screening room for ~5h. We had to pay extra because they normally close earlier on a weeknight
    • Showed up early to meet the projectionist and get a technical rundown
    • Setup was a friend’s laptop plugged into HDMI running up to the projector booth
    • Nobody complained when we brought out a disk full of torrented movies
    • The theater already had a license to sell alcohol, so we had that covered
    • We brought a small bit of outside food, and nobody complained

    It was absolutely the best time I ever had at a cinema. When the evening wound down, the projectionist invited us into the back area for a tour of the projection equipment.

    I think that because we were a private event the rules about screening copyrighted materials to public audiences did not apply.










  • Despite what the length of their privacy policies might suggest, first party sites are a lot stingier with their user data now than they’ve been in the past. The value of knowing who someone is and what they want is derived when you convince them to pull out a credit card, at which point you need to collect their data anyway.

    Thus, I think we’ll see two tiers of data collection: Deep first-party info shared between retailers and data brokers to target advertising on their first party site, and less granular banner advertising based on privacy sandbox, taking the place of drive-by cookie drops. If privacy sandbox is as good for random blogs as industry is expecting (ie, not as perfect as third party cookies, but less impactful than Apple’s ITP was), I don’t think we will see a wave of email signups.


  • I don’t quite understand the leap from “No third party cookies” to “You need to create an account”.

    If you’re visiting a site and they drop a cookie, that’s a first party cookie. You don’t need to log in for that to happen, and they can track you all the same. Taking identifiers from a first party cookie and passing them to advertisers will still be a thing, it’ll just require closer coordination between the site and the advertiser than if the advertiser dropped their own cookie.

    Now yes, that first party cookie won’t follow you around to other websites and track your behavior there, but creating an account wouldn’t enable this anyway. Besides, Google’s Privacy Sandbox product suite is intended to fill this role in a less granular way (associating k-anonymized ids with advertising topics across websites).



  • In truth, there were several reasons that one could decline a duel without loss of honor. For example if the duel challenge was issued with obvious quarrelous intent.

    Eg:

    “You’re a liar”

    “No I’m not. What are you talking about?”

    “Ah, so you deny being a liar?”

    “Yes, wtf are you getting at?”

    “Then by your denial, you accuse me of being a liar! This insult shall not stand. I demand satisfaction.”

    “Lol, fuck off”

    Another case would be if one duelist was not of sufficient station to match the honor of their opponent. A freshly-minted bourgeoisie vs a nobleman, for example.

    Lastly, duels might be turned down if it were obvious to all that that a significant skill mismatch were at play. For example, a military officer might not be allowed to duel a civilian with sabres. Guns, however, were generally considered more egalitarian.