They’re going to have a real big problem with this one because playing the games on an emulator isn’t illegal so first they need to prove they don’t own a legit copy and they need to figure that out before bringing suit.

No.

These are aluminum.

Similarly the antenna was mounted on the tower above decks like the rest of the communication equipment.

There will be more than a firing, chiefs arent often walking the ropes near the antennas so there has to be accomplices and they’re almost certainly going to be charged with a national security violation since starlink has two way com and thusly Elon likely knew it’s location at all times.

The trimaran aluminum hull will allow flight operations up to sea state 5.[11]

Ed: to be clear they ended up being some of the worst ships America had ever produced.

And the really fun ones we refuse to sign for so technically we aren’t bound by them.

She taught him the value of a dollar not how to dispose of a corpse.

If attacked they attack, that’s shitty evidence because they would have struck back anyway.

No that’s what severance clauses are for. Anything not legal can’t be enforced but the contract minus those sections stands. Similarly she was not forced to have the surgery in any way at all. She has to return the device that she agreed to return, the surgery was optional.

They sorta are though boss and this wasn’t in California iirc.

Ed:

But it wasn’t to last. In 2013, NeuroVista, the company that made the device, essentially ran out of money. The trial participants were advised to have their implants removed. (The company itself no longer exists.)

The ai wasn’t supported any longer and both external and internal devices were no longer useful. Whoever buys the company would be buying the ai and the rights to the device, at that point they could have restored the device if the electrodes weren’t removed. It seems they’re quite confident that wouldn’t happen anytime soon and so opted to have the electrodes removed.

You can. They can do the surgery or they can be sued, it’s a binary choice.

Morals are a different story but legally no, it’s quite clear and arbitration agreements are pretty literally sections of contracts that say you can’t argue certain things in certain ways.

I mean if she agreed to it by contract there’s not much to argue.

Just an fyi resend and that number usually goes away. They did the same thing to me for the same year and when questioned they said they just never got the paperwork. Resent and everything was fine.

Did you know Hitler was imprisoned ostensibly for terrorism only to them me released, create a terrorist organization, take power and then murder a few million people, notably many many Jews.

We can do this all day, the comparison is obvious and relevant.

I don’t know about this dude specifically but statistically it’s unlikely his family were Holocaust survivors given the incredibly small amount of survivers who immigrated and the fewer still who stayed.

Worse than that, if she didn’t know it was his that also means she didn’t know who’s it is.

It’s not targeted malicious behavior just sciociopathic behavior.

The giant American trucks don’t meet American road standards…

Cant/won’t provide identifiable information.

Explains their bigotry then says they’re not bigoted… Genius.

That would be bigotry, accept it. Everyone is bigoted in some way, stop crying because people treat you the way you act.

Actually no I can’t.

I couldn’t own firearms or vote but this motherfucker could be president? Literally makes no sense and moreso if you read the reasoning as to why voting rights and firearm right can be restricted.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_death

In the uk you can pet much guarantee that won’t happen because it would shut down their surveillance state.

More than half the national population are left leaning democratic voters and as such Republicanism is by definition abnormal and should by their logic be banned.