Removed by mod

it’s satire

I don’t think even the combined power of all the phones in the plane would be enough to cause interference for anyone

The phone’s modem is not powerful enough, it takes a couple watts at most, which is tiiny compared to what a cell tower can output

You don’t, but they do. It’s a no brainer for them, which the parent comment expressed quite clearly

How else am I gonna have a neat.af domain tho

Yep, fair enough.

Yeah that’s very far from the definition of a scam. A bad product isn’t a scam, you know exactly what you’re getting, it’s on you if you “fall” for it.

Still more complicated than Netflix.

Also, none of the money you pay goes to the original creators. If I’m already paying, I want at least of the cash to go to them.

But this is a Piracy community. RD costs money. Not good enough. We’re talking about the “ideal” solution.

So that’s interesting, how exactly are they scamming people?

Yeah but you just named three things you’ve got to setup to work together, where RD is actually paid.

Netflix you open and it works, that’s my point.

Netflix, with everything and with an option to download an .mp4 if desired.

The jammers don’t disable the cameras, they just prevent them from streaming the captured video to the recording machine.

If the cameras had a local buffer, they’d be able to keep recording even if the signal was jammed.

I think the nose not falling off is typical

A random company in Norway is probably the best equipped to do this kinda testing.

Cold? Check. ICEs on the road? Check. A buunch of electric vehicles on the road? Check.

You mean split 10/90 between the editors+publishers and lawyers?

If you read at least the summary from the bot, you’d see that discord isn’t and never was profitable.

I wouldn’t call that “doing too well to fire people”, just means they fucked up and hired more people than they could financially/operationally afford

Afraid it doesn’t apply to copyright claims, but I might be wrong on that

Maybe?

Yep, agreed, that’s the worst thing about it. Makes sense more or less otherwise.

Disney, or anyone for that matter, can copyright claim any video. Youtube just plays ball because that’s the simplest thing to do.

It’s on them to prove, in court, that it actually is copyrightable and that they own the copyright to the content, which they’d fail to do.

The win is for the uploader and for the public, since now you can “be sure” that Disney won’t take you to court over it, which would be a costly endeavor for you. Even if Disney would almost surely lose.

It does change the fact that people don’t have to be afraid to use any of it.

Even though Disney would lose in court, you really don’t want to ever be in the same room as Disney’s lawyers.