![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
It doesn’t send a yes/no signal it sends the fingerprint to be compared to the stored one
It doesn’t send a yes/no signal it sends the fingerprint to be compared to the stored one
I just corrected that, can’t I without disagreeing?
Pretty sure this is not true. That’s how apple’s fingerprint scanners work. On android the fingerprint data is stored either in the tpm or a part of the storage encrypted by it.
Pretty sure Samsung does it to appease carriers since they sell unlocked snapdragon variants elsewhere
Do torrent clients actually check the hash? I’ve had borked downloads that qbittorrent showed as complete but had to be redownloaded upon a recheck before.
Windows update?
After using Linux for a while all the window animations of windows start to look jarring too
And then put it into an os that sloppily compresses its wallpapers before displaying them
Because it has ‘llm’ in it? Makes way more sense than a music player formerly known as Winamp
Edit: it seems the company that owns it rebranded itself to llama last year. Still think it’s a stupid choice since nobody knows their name and everybody knows Winamp. ‘freeamp’ would be the logical choice
Why would they call the open version ‘openllama’? Isn’t llama that ai model?
Edit: Thanks for the downvotes people, I’m sorry for not knowing a meme in a language that’s not my native from before I was born
One of the biggest advantages of using Linux over windows is the lack of those endless seo sites while troubleshooting.
Isn’t asrock asus
Infinite captcha loop
If it’s being done remotely it is not recalled, that’s my entire point.
Most of my bother comes from how people are reacting with kneejerk appeals to the status quo instead of actually responding to what I (and others) wrote, think of me what you will
I’m sorry for wanting things to mean what they mean
The only thing that is different in this entire process is how the remedy is applied.
And that’s the thing that matters to the person who owns the car. Currently when a user sees that word they don’t know what they need to do to fix it. You can have some other name encompassing both (like ‘critical fix’), but if you keep recall for when that fix isn’t user applicable, (and furthermore have specific names for the fixes themselves if they’re user applicable) people would immediately understand
Lots of people here are disagreeing with me but I’m yet to see an argument about why that shouldn’t be the case other than that it currently isn’t. But even that’s an argument for why changing the term would be difficult, not for why calling every fix ‘recall’ makes sense.
Why cause confusion over calling software updates different things based solely on who installs it and/or how it’s installed?
Because they’re different things? For the user it doesn’t matter if they’re both same legally, in one case they need to bring their car somewhere, in the other one they don’t. If anything it’s confusing to call them both a recall.
Wtf are talking about?
I’m talking about this specific word that means bringing the thing back from where it went in every context but cars.
Where is the car being recalled to? I get that that’s the word that stuck for ‘critical fix’ or whatever but if you don’t need to bring it back that’s not a recall. Call it something else.
they are installing a fix provided by the company
So the user is applying the fix? What else do you expect that to mean?
Exactly