For some reason I also read “first” the first time I looked at the title
For some reason I also read “first” the first time I looked at the title
Exactly same as with a hammer ;)
Firefox turns the fan on while Chrome doesn’t
Does it also happen when you change user-agent to chrome? Google has been worsening the experience of their services on non-Chrome browsers for a solid few years now
That I don’t know. I haven’t been looking into one-board computers for a while. The one I bought ~10 years ago was running out of juice when I was trying to run Kodi on it last year. Wifi shouldn’t be a problem IMO, I’ve been using mine as torrent downloader and hosted a few university projects (dynamic web apps) on it. The graphics might. I would guess that as long as you find one with decent specs (so probably not the 10$ one) it should work. I’m sure there’s someone who is doing exactly that and either could answer what to buy/look for or wrote a blog about it
Yes, I can. But you need much more to accomplish this
There are other communities too
Maybe I’m going to do something, maybe I’m not. Why the demanding tone?
I also think that grassroots economy would work better for many things. But we’re not there, the world doesn’t work like that ATM. Wish for 10% of people to contribute is very optimistic IMO.
You need much wider spread, and for me (for example) your tool is the only thing that gives you any credibility. If there are others like me, you might be missing clout for a call to support like that to simply just work
24h for people to react to a comment in some post?
I think you under-advertised your proposal
“updoot”
Clear what you’re referencing, IMO flows nicely and AFAIK (IANAL) isn’t a trademark
Yes, but that’s only because a generation found some random, specific motion that scored better. Not because it analyzed that doing a skip should be possible
Yes, but that’s kind of my point
We see it learn something with insane precision but most often it is almost an effect of over-training. It probably would require less time to learn another layout but it’s not learning the general rules (can’t go through walls, holes are bad, we want to get to X), it learns the specific layout. Each time a layout changes, it would have to re-learn it
It is impressive and enables automation in a lot of areas, but in the end it is still only machine learning, adapting weights to specific scenario
It’s cool but my question is (I did not see this addressed in the article nor video but might have missed it) did it learn to win the game in general terms or only this one example? I mean, if the layout of the board was changed, would it still solve it?
I’m not big on gambling. But I feel I could bet that their software/firmware is so bad that someone could still hack the network via the bricked printer
Interesting. Will port87 work with third-party mail clients?
network-connected wrenches
Do wrenches really need to be networked? Honest question
But then that is for desktop Firefox, not mobile. Right?
This is on mobile?
over 450 add-ons
But no Cookie AutoDelete among them. Firefox Nightly is still better
So it’s not like: when I affect the hue (some attribute) of my half, the other half will change too? That has always been my understanding of it
The more I think about it, the less sense this graphic has
just checking on wikipedia, divided by area GB should have bar around twice high as Germany. 209k m^2 vs 357k m^2
big as a city sprawling datacenter complex and a bunch of racks in the cellar both count as 1?