![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/41e39366-cb91-4d4a-bc07-a47621cb7d5f.jpeg)
Right, that wasn’t the right word there, but you get what I mean.
Right, that wasn’t the right word there, but you get what I mean.
I hope you interpret “to death” as an euphemism in that case hah
The bible seems to consider it murder only if it’s another christian.
[if someone] has gone and served other gods and worshiped them, […] you shall stone that man or woman to death with stones.
-Deuteronomy 17:2-5
If your brother, the son of your mother, or your son or your daughter or the wife you embrace or your friend who is as your own soul entices you secretly, saying, ‘Let us go and serve other gods,’ […] you shall kill him. Your hand shall be first against him to put him to death.
-Deuteronomy 13:6-10
so at leat 4 burgers per bald eagle
Speech recognition has existed far before 2019.
The only actual connections are fame and racism. Kind of takes the air out of the headline imo
Ford was an innovative car maker, Musk bought an innovative car maker. They are not the same.
Not necessarily a generally diminished sense of smell. We stop sensing smells when we get very used to them.
I agree, but you asked specifically about legality.
Well, the question was on the practice’s legality, not its morality.
So yes.
No, it was added to the Geneva convention in 1977
Roses are red, violets are blue, sod off.
that was a particularly large one, but lots of people old enough at any given time will feel the world is changing and that it’s somehow dangerous.
I agree, some of the time the changes are much larger than others, but there will always at any given time be people that feel this is true about their particular time.
why not both?
If parents keep throwing kids into the public piranha tub, I’m absolutely blaming the parents, but I will still question why we keep a public piranha tub.
i said better, not good.
problem is, that statement can be applied at any given time in history
What the fuck, be a grown up person and just say you’re not interested.
How fragile are you?!
I agree (or rather, disagree) with both sides here. Australia should of course not be able to order global takedowns, but xitter should want to take it down anyways for their own reasons.
two competing ones are better than one at least.
I though it was working against Big Baby *ahem*