Its funny, I can not read a single word of that article and confidently say that he didnt suggest that. I can do this so easily because EVERY TIME these stories are exaggerations or directly manufactured stories based on “sources close to trump”.

deleted by creator

Not from the american perspective.

Left corporate media - CNN, MSNBC ect

Right corporate media - FOX ect

The three stories I mention are; “Guy at CPAC wants theocracy”, “Trump called wife by wrong name”, “Trump says black people like him due to being accused of crimes”, with a bonus still up in the air “Putin definitely killed Navalny, dont ask questions” and a fourth “Israel killed thousand or hundreds of civilians while giving out food”. Two of those you can instantly know they are bullshit, and three you need more info, but logically they dont make sense.

You dont have to trust what someone like ben shapiro has to say, you can listen and judge for yourself. Coincidently enough, earlier yesterday I was listening “Part of the Problem” and they were explaining what Shapiro was wrong about. As far as political podcasts go, I like the part of the problem - Your welcome - Timcast - The poltical Orphanage - Liberty Lockdown - The matt walsh show - Patrick Bet-David - JRE. My opinions are always open to change, and do.

I agree NPR tries to be neutral, but they have a natural bias, if you count that in, they can be interesting.

I found them misleading just by using basic logic and listening to podcasts that instantly were able to refute the corporate media sources.

The issue with corporate media is that they are directly funded and owned by people with agendas that are not their own. Podcasts can be great, but then also biased, for example anything Ben Shapiro says about Israel is probably wrong.

Podcasts are good because they are typically long form and will literally read the story and then point out what is wrong and who is lying. And after a while you can get tell if the podcaster ever lies to you, and you know their bias.

I can literally point to three stories this week by the corporate media that were false or misleading off the top of my head.

Why do you keep trusting them when they just report things without thinking or maybe worse, dont report stories because they harm a narative?

They are only as trustworthy as they are. I think that most corporate news sources mislead at best, and lie directly if it is in their interest. I think there are many podcasts that are not always correct, but they are trying to tell the truth. Do you think mainstream sources are trustworthy?

Like that Joe was involved in his sons business which involved a foreign country, and Joe said he was not involved in any of his sons business things. Bobilinsky confirmed that it was true and that the code name was Joe. Other things are open knowledge that they dont even hide.

I think republicans are mostly cowards and I am not here to defend the things they do.

There are lots of things in the laptop that show at best there is a conflict of interest. There is a reason the Bobilinsky guy had a press conference, because he knew it was a big deal, and thought it was important to let people know.

Again, I am explaining te difference not making a judgement.

It would be what was on the laptop and what he has been doing for and with his son. For example there was “10 for the big guy” thing. And then there is Joe lying about interacting with his sons associates. And then there is why they were all paying his son so much but not getting the influence they were obviously buying. And then Joe getting the prosecutor that was investigating the company his son was getting money from. And a bunch more. There are all kinds of podcasts that will lay it all out and list it if you are actually wanting to know.

The main problem is they should have an extensive investigation like trump had with russia. At best Joe would have a series of conflicts of interest, but they would need to look into all the things.

You dont think its important to point out that the left will miss out on facts if they only listen to their news sources?

I dont know, I think both MSNBC and Fox have said something like that as a legal argument. But if it were not clear, I dont listen to Fox or watch cable television, I am in my 40s not 70s.

That was a single person, not the whole thing. The laptop was completely independent of that guy.

Sure there is, but you guys dont hear about it because you listen to the lefts corporate media. People that listen to Fox dont do this kind of social media, if you want to insult them use Ben Shapiro, or Larry Elder.

I did not make a judgment, I just explained the difference. Why default to “WHATEVER VLAD!!! LOLOLOLO!!!”?

Its not about just the kids crimes, its a question of how Joe was involved.