By the same logic however, mods would have no power to actually moderate. Their moderation ability is directly proportional to their potential for abuse. And I think we can all agree we’ve long passed the point where communities are able to survive without moderation, at least in their current form (which is what OP is discussing).
If you’re going to remove 90% of the content on lemmy, is there even a point staying on it?
Really shitty scaremongering article. I’d like to know how exactly indeed investment in fusion could potentially make it unsuitable for public use, as the article claims?
For all intents and purposes, (…) as close to a real person as technology can create.
Again, I point you towards video games and how they got blamed for violence. You could have used the same statement about them 20 years ago.
The biggest danger with allowing people to do whatever they want to a sex bot is that it has the possibility to encourage dangerous behavior in some people to the point where they are comfortable doing it to a real person.
This tired old argument gets trotted out with every new technology and hobby. D&D, Video games, VR, etc etc.
The current global population growth rate is unsustainable.
That’s a myth. The current global population growth rate is dropping precipitously and is expected to hit negative rates within this century. The fertility rate per woman is at 2.3, from a peak of 5.3 in the 60s. That’s barely above replacement level. At current trends we’ll be at replacement level in a couple decades.
An NPC in a game has intelligence
By what definition of the word? Most dictionaries define it as some variant of ‘the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills.’
None of those reasons apply to electric cars, though. What’s their stance on that?
Aren’t there already records of all your border crossings? I don’t see the difference, what am I missing?
I mean, most of the masses already do meet that requirement. OP seems to think there are only ‘masses’ in the US and nowhere else.
I have never understood people who make this argument. In all of history, can you point to a single time when technology wasn’t eventually commercialised and made available to the masses at affordable prices? The billionaires don’t want to keep it to themselves, they want you buying more stuff from them.
Caveat 1: Move out of the US
Caveat 2: ???
Caveat 3: Extended youth
Yeah it’s not like the rest of the population ever benefits from advances in technology… Oh wait…
I have semi face-blindness, it takes several meetings before I can start recognising a person’s face. Something like this would actually be a lifesaver for me, just so I can know who I’m talking to and whether I’ve met them before.
The actual point was, bomb making instructions have been floating around on search engine results since the days of dial up. That particular manuscript itself has existed since before the days of the Internet. There’s nothing cgpt could give you that you couldn’t have found by typing the same query into Google. Getting the instructions is literally the easiest, least effort, least risk part of building a bomb.
I see you’ve never heard of the Anarchist’s Cookbook
Is it more of a public safety issue than if they actually build a working one from a legit bomb manual and deploy it?
asking it the steps to create a bomb
That sounds like a self-correcting issue right there
What makes you think he’s an idiot as opposed to lying through his teeth?
- ‘It’s difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on not understanding it’