• atrielienz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Does anyone else feel like this is irresponsible? Like, I get it, humans have been destroying the ecosystems of endangered and extinct animals for awhile now. But the world is actively warming up. And even if this is successful, how do we create enough of them to survive and procreate without defects etc. And where the hell will they live? I just have some concerns.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nearly every species ever has gone extinct. What you see around you are those few species that made it to the present. So, yes, on one hand it doesn’t matter. On the other hand, a new population of elephants isn’t going to affect the world and we can appreciate them.

    • Noobnarski@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It is likely that we humans or our ancestors were responsible for the extinction of most of the megafauna around the world, so we would only be undoing our own damage I guess.

      • FireWire400@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        We’d first have to undo all the damage we did to the rest of the Earth which, even if we wanted, we couldn’t do.

        As far as I understand, the whole “de-extinction” thing is just a huge flex on our part.