• trafficnab@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Depending on how important these large language models end up being to society, I’d rather everyone be able to freely use copyrighted works to train them, rather than reserve their use solely for the corporations rich enough to pay for the licensing or lucky enough to already have the rights to a trove of source material

    OpenAI losing this battle is how we ensure that the only people that can legally train these things are the Microsofts, Googles, and the Adobes of the world so, bizarrely, as much as I think OpenAI has turned into greedy corpo scum, I feel compelled to side with them here

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      the corporations rich enough to pay for the licensing or lucky enough to already have the rights to a trove of source material

      Oh, don’t worry about them. Start-ups can get VC funding to pay for the licenses. Eventually we all pay. The likes of Sam Altman can get rich. The venture capitalists can get rich. All while the heirs of the NYT or Getty empires get richer still. Everyone will be rich. Except us, of course. It’s very ethical. We all want ethical AI and that means capitalist AI.

      • trafficnab@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        The way I see it, creatives lose no matter what here, so they can either lose and only the corpos benefit, or they can lose and everyone benefits