“Half of the Israeli public is no longer in favor of the war,” one friend told me Saturday night as we witnessed thousands of Israelis take to the streets to protest the Israeli government under the slogan, “Elections Now.” “Yes, but the other half is all-in, and REALLY in favor,” responded his wife. “And they are the more powerful group.”

She, of course, is right. For months, reports of torture and rape have emerged from Israel’s military base turned torture camp, Sde Teiman, where Israel has imprisoned thousands of Palestinians without charge. I wrote about it in a previous diary earlier this month. Palestinians who have emerged from this torture camp refer to it as the “slaughterhouse” with horrendous tales of torture, rape, abuse, and sleep deprivation being meted out by Israeli prison guards. Nearly 30 Palestinians have died while in Sde Teiman and other prisons, according to the information provided to date.

And while the precise chain of events is unclear, what we do know is that the Israeli military advocate general decided to dispatch the military police to question nine Israeli soldiers on suspicion of gang-raping and sodomizing a Palestinian man from Gaza at Sde Teiman. The man was rushed to the hospital where he exhibited signs of rape, including a ruptured bowel and broken ribs. It would be a mistake to simply think that Israel’s actions in prisons like Sde Teiman came only after October. Since becoming Israel’s national security minister in 2022, ultranationalist Itamar Ben Gvir has made prisons his target, with him authorizing abuse against Palestinians. He has also called for the death penalty to solve problems of overcrowding.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    I was optimistic in 2008 and even voted for Obama.

    We saw how that turned out, and with respect to Kamala, I expect the reboot to even worse than original, given the state of things in this country.

    • USSMojave@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      It just sounds like you would have made this exact comment and line of attack no matter who the Democrats chose, meaning it has nothing to do with Kamala

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        These days, absolutely.

        I don’t think the Democratic or Republican candidates are anything more than useful idiots for the billionaire class, and I think the vast majority of their promises are outright lies.

        We saw a great example of that over the last 2-3 years, with partisans defending very public cognitive breaks on the part of President Biden, who I personally think should be 25’d out. If he hadn’t had that exceedingly embarrassing incident at the debate, the Democrats and Democratic voters would still be defending him.

        The Obama and Trump presidencies killed any optimism I have for our country and system of government. Obama was reelected AFTER making sure the big banks suffered no ill effects of willfully destroying our economy for profit. Trump spent more than a year of his presidency (cumulatively) on vacation, and even sold the Oval Office for ad space. (And that was BEFORE he led a literal insurrection on the Capitol.)

        It’s difficult for me to understand anyone being optimistic, if you’re looking at the last 44 years (and in particular, 16 years) with an objective eye.

        • Katana314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Hot take: 90% of their promises fallen short are because of Republican representatives stonewalling them to make them look incompetent (because their voters don’t follow logic). Vote the Republicans out, and they can get free reign to make real progress.

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            90% of their promises fallen short are because of Republican representatives

            I don’t think history bears this out, especially after Obama.

            The reality is that, especially after Citizens United, our federal legislators are beholden to the billionaire class, and further, all of them are multi-millionaires. They choose to rule as conservatives because it benefits them and the people who fund their campaigns.

            • Katana314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Why does history not bear this out? Because Obama had a brief slim majority?

              Even having a 60% democratic majority doesn’t do what you think it does. The Democratic Party, thankfully, is not a hive mind. It’s normal for 15% of them to vote differently on a subject based on differing opinions. But Republicans will denounce a bill as illegal, immoral, and then still vote it in to tow the party line.

              • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                I’ve heard all of the excuses for how powerless Democrats are.

                After watching the ACA and the Trump Tax Cuts and Jobs Act pass with simple majorities, the excuses don’t make sense anymore. There is a method to fulfill a president’s promises, and they choose not to use it when they have the power to do so.

                And notice that the Republicans just ignored the Parliamentarian, whom Democrats sometimes use as another excuse as to why they chose not to fulfill their promises.

                That’s not a matter of opinion. It’s fact.

                • Katana314@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Yeah, you’ve heard the excuses. Just scared to respond to them, I suppose. The answer should be obvious: We don’t want a dictatorship.

                  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    3 months ago

                    I understand that in a symbolic sense.

                    The problem is that it doesn’t matter for the majority of Americans, because they can legally be paid so little that the person we elect is immaterial to the day-to-day suffering they experience in our civilized republic. (2/3 of the US states still have a $7 minimum wage.)

                    And, that fact has remained true across two Democratic presidents who had total control of Congress, which means there’s no reason to expect that it will be any different under a Harris presidency.

        • USSMojave@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s either Harris or fascism, and it sounds like you’ve already made your choice. Have fun being miserable! #KamalaHarris #BlueWave #NotGoingBack

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Respectfully, it’s not.

            It’s two sides of a single fascist coin, and none of this is fun for me. I have eighty-year old parents forced to drive for DoorDash (using my car) or starve.