• A Phlaming Phoenix@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Since the act of writing to an SSD is an act of wear that will eventually lead to a broken storage device, using an SSD for swap is a uniquely bad idea, right? Are Macs still designed so that you can’t replace your own hardware easily? I’ve never owned one, but I was asked to service one many years ago and it was a real pain.

      • helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Those SSD are both hardware and software locked to the mother board. Once the SSD goes, the whole machine goes. The same can be said about RAM…once that goes, the mother board does too.

        Perhaps the goal is to use the SSD as a sacrifice in order to extend the life of the obviously more important RAM.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          Although RAM is vastly more durable than the flash chips of an SSD, so that wouldn’t make sense.

          It might make more sense from a cost viewpoint, since flash is typically cheaper than RAM.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          Those SSD are both hardware and software locked to the mother board.

          I know they did it with RAM which is bad enough but to do it with SSDs as well. That alone is a reason not to get an Apple device.

    • Asifall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      What’s the thermal impact of a ram module? Don’t they use like 2 or 3 watts even in a desktop? Can’t be much…