syd@lemy.lol to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-210 months ago15M Trello accounts have been leakedlemy.lolimagemessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up1617arrow-down114file-text
arrow-up1603arrow-down1image15M Trello accounts have been leakedlemy.lolsyd@lemy.lol to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-210 months agomessage-square104fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareglitch1985@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down2·10 months agoCGNAT would throw a wrench in that when you have thousands of users using mobile data and they appear to be coming from the same ip.
minus-squareSaik0@lemmy.saik0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·10 months agoYou look for trends, not raw numbers. If an ip increase 500%in 10 minutes… throttle it a bit… insert wait times. If it’s trust worthy then allow new value to become normal… otherwise keep the ip throttled.
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-210 months agoNooooo, people keep telling me IPv6 will be insecure because of no longer having NAT. Mostly people who don’t know what a subnet is, but people.
CGNAT would throw a wrench in that when you have thousands of users using mobile data and they appear to be coming from the same ip.
You look for trends, not raw numbers. If an ip increase 500%in 10 minutes… throttle it a bit… insert wait times. If it’s trust worthy then allow new value to become normal… otherwise keep the ip throttled.
Nooooo, people keep telling me IPv6 will be insecure because of no longer having NAT.
Mostly people who don’t know what a subnet is, but people.