‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says::Pressure grows on artificial intelligence firms over the content used to train their products

  • Jomega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    You’re comparing something humans often do subconsciously to a machine that was programmed to do that. Unless you’re arguing that intent doesn’t matter (pretty much every judge in America will tell you it does) then we’re talking about 2 completely different things.

    Edit: Disregard the struck out portion of my comment. Apparently I don’t know shit about law. My point is that comparing a a quirk of human psychology to the strict programming of a machine is a false equivalency.

      • Jomega@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I looked it up and you’re right. I must of been thinking of a different crime. That’ll teach me to go spouting off about stuff.

        My point that AI is programmed to recycle and humans aren’t is still something I stand by, so I edited my comment.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Another proof that it is a bullshit law. Someone could literally die on my property and there are situations where I would not even get a small fine.