![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
But they are using a loophole to gain sensitive data. They did not gain unauthorised access to the system.
But they are using a loophole to gain sensitive data. They did not gain unauthorised access to the system.
So your googling proved him right. What’s embarrassing about being right?
There are lots of comments on that thread trying to divert the issue by pointing out the violence done by the western countries. I would assume his comment was in response to one of these comments, so he wouldn’t be the one to bring up the West into the discussion.
And AMD is following along with the stupid naming scheme in the next generation.
But is the Kangoo in the same price category as the EVs that spy on us? Is it even released at a time when major corporations spying on everyone is so normalized like it is today? I think both of these being no would explain why that car is so nice, simple, and reliable.
If Scarlett Johansson is trying to accuse them of using her voice without consent, do you really think it will only end up in the court of public opinion? My point is that it might escalate to court, which OpenAI might not want to deal with. Backing down in this case is just as much of an admission of guilt as taking a settlement out of court, which is not at all.
The Tegra X1 is slower than existing underpowered arm processors used in windows laptop. It’s nowhere near performant enough.
Not in this case.
I guess every out of court settlement is an admission of guilt in your eyes? It’s nothing to do with the massive amount of money wasted dealing with legal matters or anything.
And Apple was not selling those chips to Windows laptop manufacturers.
I’m using Sync for Lemmy. I’m guessing it’s a different summary than the multi sentence summary I can see under the title post. That one doesn’t specify this happens in China.
Which 1 sentence summary? Am I blind?
That’s not whataboutism.
If you go by that logic, most things in FOSS would be considered bad, which is not true.
People used to think their lives are over if they were caught alone with someone of the opposite sex they’re not married to. That is no longer the case in western countries due to normalisation.
The thing that makes them want to die is societal pressure, not the act itself. In this case, if societal pressure from having fake nudes of yourself spread is removed, most of the harm done to people should be neutralised.
How constantly does it spit out copyrighted material? Is there data on that?
You just answered your own question.
Lol, can’t even bother to address such a simple point, so pathetic.
The guy said less victimized and you conclude he meant cannot be victimized. Can you be any more stupid?
But by the guy’s definition, they also used a loophole to extract sensitive information, so it it also an exploit.